All profiles/U.S. House/CA

Aisha Wahab

Democrat U.S. House · CA-14 · cycle 2026 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in CA
100%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $635,249 in the 2026 cycle. FEC ↗

6.1% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 26.1% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 100% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

These figures cover an in-progress election cycle and aren't yet comparable across the U.S. House — funding is spread across individual and committee sources.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share6.1%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size7.9%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions26.1%
Committee & JFC transfer share0%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share89%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration—
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
6.1%
93.9%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
73.9%
26.1%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share down from 25% (2020) to 6.1% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
2020 25%2026 6.1%
Direct-contribution share
2020 98.8%2026 100%
PAC share of contributions
2020 0%2026 26.1%
Cash on hand
2020 $02026 $150K

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $1.1M in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $615K supporting, $518K opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

COMMITTEE FOR WORKING FAMILIES, SPONSORED BY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS FEC ↗
$576K supporting
BOLD AMERICA FEC ↗
$518K opposing
ALAMEDA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE FEC ↗
$39K supporting
UNITY & JUSTICE FUND FEC ↗
$395 supporting
HEALTH CARE SAVES LIVES FEC ↗
$146 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.