All profiles/U.S. House/CA

Juan Vargas

Democrat U.S. House · CA-52 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in CA
99.7%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $790,625 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 7th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

0.9% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 73% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.7% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

PACs supplied 73% of contributions here — among the more PAC-funded campaigns in the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share0.9%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size1%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions73%
Committee & JFC transfer share0%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share87.1%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration39.9%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
0.9%
99.1%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
27%
73%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share steady near 0.1% from 1992 to 2026 A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
1992 0%1996 0%1998 0%2000 0%2004 0.3%2006 5%2008 100%2012 3.5%2014 1.8%2016 1.5%2018 1.5%2020 1.3%2022 0.6%2024 0.9%2026 0.1%
Direct-contribution share
1992 0%1996 2.4%1998 23%2000 0%2004 43.5%2006 100%2008 100%2012 99.9%2014 99.3%2016 88.5%2018 98.8%2020 94.8%2022 87.1%2024 99.7%2026 99.8%
PAC share of contributions
1992 0%1996 0%1998 43.5%2000 0%2004 14.7%2006 17.3%2008 0%2012 62.1%2014 77.9%2016 77.7%2018 78.1%2020 81.1%2022 69.3%2024 73%2026 76%
Cash on hand
1992 $01996 $3121998 $882000 $3K2004 $2K2006 $2K2008 $422012 $51K2014 $11K2016 $80K2018 $72K2020 $70K2022 $220K2024 $91K2026 $164K

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Financial Services
Minority
House Committee on Financial Services — National Security, Illicit Finance, and International Financial Institutions
Minority
House Committee on Financial Services — Capital Markets
Minority
House Committee on Financial Services — Financial Institutions
Minority

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Reconciles to the committee's full itemized-individual total for this cycle.

unclassified
$78K · 37% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$42K · 19.8% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$31K · 14.6% of itemized
Real estate
$28K · 13.1% of itemized
Legal
$14K · 6.7% of itemized
Healthcare
$13K · 6.3% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$6K · 2.7% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $2K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $2K supporting, $750 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

DMFI PAC FEC ↗
$1K supporting
REFORM LEADERS PAC FEC ↗
$750 opposing
COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC FEC ↗
$185 supporting
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PAC FEC ↗
$31 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.