All profiles/U.S. House/NY

Claudia Tenney

Republican U.S. House · NY-24 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in NY
93.9%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $2,995,403 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 69th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

36.6% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 42.8% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 93.9% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Small-dollar donors under $200 supplied 36.6% of this campaign's individual money — among the more small-dollar-funded campaigns in the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share36.6%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size44%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions42.8%
Committee & JFC transfer share6.1%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share31.6%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration27.4%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
36.6%
63.4%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
57.2%
42.8%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share down from 30.3% (2014) to 28% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
2014 30.3%2016 11.4%2018 17.5%2020 31.2%2022 27.1%2024 36.6%2026 28%
Direct-contribution share
2014 100%2016 99.9%2018 78.3%2020 78.1%2022 77.4%2024 93.9%2026 82.5%
PAC share of contributions
2014 4.2%2016 35.3%2018 52.8%2020 18.1%2022 26.9%2024 42.8%2026 53.5%
Cash on hand
2014 $5K2016 $87K2018 $77K2020 $403K2022 $61K2024 $355K2026 $1.4M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Majority
House Committee on Ways and Means
Majority
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Majority
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology — Energy
Majority
House Committee on Ways and Means — Trade
Majority
House Committee on Ways and Means — Health
Majority
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — National Intelligence Enterprise
Majority
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture
Majority

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $211 in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $0 supporting, $211 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

RURAL FREEDOM NETWORK FEC ↗
$211 opposing

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.