All profiles/U.S. House/CA

Mark Takano

Democrat U.S. House · CA-39 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in CA
95.5%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $1,289,818 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 25th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

18% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 43.6% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 95.5% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share18%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size22.4%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions43.6%
Committee & JFC transfer share3.9%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share77.4%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration23.9%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
18%
82%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
56.4%
43.6%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 0% (1992) to 22.4% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
1992 0%1994 0%2012 17.2%2014 16.2%2016 12.4%2018 11.7%2020 10.6%2022 16%2024 18%2026 22.4%
Direct-contribution share
1992 45.9%1994 54.1%2012 98.8%2014 99.4%2016 99%2018 98.9%2020 99.8%2022 99.1%2024 95.5%2026 98.8%
PAC share of contributions
1992 47.7%1994 54.3%2012 32.7%2014 25.6%2016 30.2%2018 32%2020 33.7%2022 31.7%2024 43.6%2026 45.9%
Cash on hand
1992 $2K1994 $4K2012 $25K2014 $40K2016 $116K2018 $93K2020 $164K2022 $491K2024 $269K2026 $186K

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Ranking Member
House Committee on Education and Workforce
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce — Higher Education and Workforce Development
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce — Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce — Workforce Protections
Minority

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified
$209K · 36.8% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$155K · 27.3% of itemized
Legal
$55K · 9.6% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$49K · 8.7% of itemized
Self-employed
$41K · 7.2% of itemized
Healthcare
$32K · 5.6% of itemized
Real estate
$24K · 4.3% of itemized
Education
$18K · 3.2% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$13K · 2.4% of itemized
Technology
$9K · 1.6% of itemized
Government
$4K · 0.7% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $141K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $141K supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

EQUALITY PROJECT PAC FEC ↗
$141K supporting
COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC FEC ↗
$185 supporting
GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTION FEC ↗
$55 supporting
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PAC FEC ↗
$31 supporting
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION FEC ↗
$10 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.