All profiles/U.S. House/MI

Haley M. Stevens

Democrat U.S. House · MI-11 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in MI
99.8%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $2,662,469 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 63rd percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

9.8% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 44.7% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.8% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share9.8%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size15.9%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions44.7%
Committee & JFC transfer share0%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share58.5%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration10%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
9.8%
90.2%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
55.3%
44.7%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share down from 19.5% (2018) to 4.7% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
2018 19.5%2020 14.6%2022 9.7%2024 9.8%2026 4.7%
Direct-contribution share
2018 88.4%2020 93.6%2022 99.1%2024 99.8%2026 83.2%
PAC share of contributions
2018 14.3%2020 30%2022 26.3%2024 44.7%2026 37.8%
Cash on hand
2018 $16K2020 $85K2022 $7K2024 $754K2026 $30

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce
Minority
House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Minority
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology — Research and Technology
Ranking Member
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology — Space and Aeronautics
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce — Workforce Protections
Minority

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified
$450K · 33.9% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$328K · 24.8% of itemized
Legal
$89K · 6.7% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$71K · 5.4% of itemized
Real estate
$56K · 4.3% of itemized
Self-employed
$54K · 4.1% of itemized
Healthcare
$41K · 3.1% of itemized
Government
$22K · 1.7% of itemized
Technology
$18K · 1.4% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$18K · 1.3% of itemized
Education
$10K · 0.7% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $541 in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $541 supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FREEDOM FUND FEC ↗
$4K supporting
SOMOS PAC FEC ↗
$3K supporting
DMFI PAC FEC ↗
$2K supporting
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION FEC ↗
$10 supporting
UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') FEC ↗

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.