All profiles/U.S. Senate/SC

Tim Scott

Republican U.S. Senate · SC · cycle 2022 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in SC
95.5%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $43,127,151 in the 2022 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 87th percentile among other U.S. Senate members this cycle.

41.3% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 7.3% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 95.5% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Small-dollar donors under $200 supplied 41.3% of this campaign's individual money — among the more small-dollar-funded campaigns in the U.S. Senate.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share41.3%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size63.4%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions7.3%
Committee & JFC transfer share4.1%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share16.4%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration1.4%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
41.3%
58.7%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
92.7%
7.3%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 15.1% (2010) to 37.3% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line. Includes cycles run for a different chamber.

Small-dollar share
2010 15.1%2012 77.3%2014 7.9%2016 3.5%2018 2.7%2020 61.8%2022 41.3%2024 40.3%2026 37.3%
Direct-contribution share
2010 99.9%2012 100%2014 92.7%2016 100%2018 98.6%2020 99.8%2022 95.5%2024 89.7%2026 87.8%
PAC share of contributions
2010 31.9%2012 0%2014 41.4%2016 47.1%2018 41.9%2020 8.4%2022 7.3%2024 4.3%2026 3.8%
Cash on hand
2010 $77K2012 $55K2014 $2.5M2016 $3.9M2018 $3.9M2020 $7.7M2022 $21.8M2024 $5.7M2026 $4.9M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Chairman
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Economic Policy
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Housing, Transportation, and Community Development
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — National Security and International Trade and Finance
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Securities, Insurance, and Investment
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Finance
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance — Energy, Natural Resources, and Infrastructure
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance — Health Care
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance — International Trade, Customs, and Global Competitiveness
Majority
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Majority
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Education and the American Family
Majority
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Employment and Workplace Safety
Majority
Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Majority
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Digital Assets
Ex Officio

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified
$1.8M · 7.9% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$977K · 4.4% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$593K · 2.6% of itemized
Real estate
$143K · 0.6% of itemized
Legal
$131K · 0.6% of itemized
Healthcare
$60K · 0.3% of itemized
Energy
$41K · 0.2% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$35K · 0.2% of itemized
Self-employed
$35K · 0.2% of itemized
Technology
$22K · 0.1% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $3.2M in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $3.2M supporting, $862 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

NATIONAL VICTORY ACTION FUND FEC ↗
$1.1M supporting
OPPORTUNITY MATTERS FUND, INC. FEC ↗
$1.0M supporting
ELBERT GUILLORY'S AMERICA FEC ↗
$261K supporting
OPPORTUNITY MATTERS FUND ACTION FEC ↗
$250K supporting
HONORING AMERICAN LAW ENFORCEMENT PAC FEC ↗
$196K supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.