All profiles/U.S. Senate/NH

Jeanne Shaheen

Democrat U.S. Senate · NH · cycle 2020 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in NH
95.2%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $18,172,383 in the 2020 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 69th percentile among other U.S. Senate members this cycle.

31.9% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 12% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 95.2% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. Senate.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share31.9%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size46.6%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions12%
Committee & JFC transfer share3.5%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share20.4%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration1.4%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
31.9%
68.1%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
88%
12%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 0% (2002) to 11% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
2002 0%2008 25.2%2010 8.6%2012 16.5%2014 33.5%2016 43.1%2018 41.2%2020 31.9%2022 39.5%2024 12.6%2026 11%
Direct-contribution share
2002 17.6%2004 0%2008 94.1%2010 93.9%2012 97.5%2014 95%2016 91.7%2018 99.1%2020 95.2%2022 89.4%2024 97.6%2026 90.3%
PAC share of contributions
2002 18.5%2008 14.7%2010 44.7%2012 35.2%2014 14.4%2016 33.6%2018 32%2020 12%2022 19.5%2024 26.1%2026 35%
Cash on hand
2002 $32K2004 $02008 $48K2010 $25K2012 $375K2014 $89K2016 $190K2018 $467K2020 $1.1M2022 $1.3M2024 $1.5M2026 $872K

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

Senate Committee on Appropriations
Minority
Senate Committee on Appropriations — Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
Ranking Member
Senate Committee on Appropriations — Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies
Minority
Senate Committee on Appropriations — Department of Defense
Minority
Senate Committee on Appropriations — Department of Homeland Security
Minority
Senate Committee on Appropriations — Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies
Minority
Senate Committee on Appropriations — State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs
Minority
Senate Committee on Armed Services
Minority
Senate Committee on Armed Services — Emerging Threats and Capabilities
Minority
Senate Committee on Armed Services — Readiness and Management Support
Minority
Senate Committee on Armed Services — Seapower
Minority
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
Ranking Member
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — Africa and Global Health Policy
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — Europe and Regional Security Cooperation
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — Multilateral International Development, Multilateral Institutions, and International Economic, Energy, and Environmental Policy
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — State Department and USAID Management, International Operations, and Bilateral International Development
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — Western Hemisphere, Transnational Crime, Civilian Security, Democracy, Human Rights, and Global Women's Issues
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Minority
Senate Select Committee on Ethics
Minority
Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Minority

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

Retired / not employed
$894K · 8.6% of itemized
unclassified
$826K · 8% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$400K · 3.9% of itemized
Legal
$224K · 2.2% of itemized
Self-employed
$202K · 1.9% of itemized
Real estate
$92K · 0.9% of itemized
Technology
$50K · 0.5% of itemized
Education
$50K · 0.5% of itemized
Healthcare
$48K · 0.5% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$42K · 0.4% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $670K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $268K supporting, $401K opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

AMERICAS PAC FEC ↗
$302K opposing
$199K supporting
NEW HAMPSHIRE FREEDOM AND LIBERTY PAC, INC. FEC ↗
$49K opposing
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES FEC ↗
$37K supporting
RESTORATION PAC FEC ↗
$37K opposing

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.