All profiles/U.S. House/TX

Christian D. Menefee

Democrat U.S. House · TX-18 · cycle 2026 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in TX
99.9%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $3,637,579 in the 2026 cycle. FEC ↗

20.6% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 6.5% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.9% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

These figures cover an in-progress election cycle and aren't yet comparable across the U.S. House — funding is spread across individual and committee sources.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share20.6%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size22.4%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions6.5%
Committee & JFC transfer share0%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share83.4%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration10.2%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
20.6%
79.4%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
93.5%
6.5%
IndividualsPACs

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Minority
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Minority
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform — Federal Law Enforcement
Minority
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform — Delivering on Government Efficiency
Minority

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $7.1M in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $7.1M supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

PROTECT PROGRESS FEC ↗
$6.5M supporting
LEADERS WE DESERVE FEC ↗
$287K supporting
PROJECT 218 FEC ↗
$200K supporting
CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC FEC ↗
$100K supporting
TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE FEC ↗
$8K supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.