Lisa Murkowski

Republican U.S. Senate · AK · cycle 2022 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in AK

91.1%

Direct-contributionshare

Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $9,319,257 in the 2022 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 35th percentile among other U.S. Senate members this cycle.

6.6% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 31.1% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 91.1% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. Senate.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score

Small-donor (grassroots) share6.6%

From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.

Small-dollar by transaction size7.9%

Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.

PAC share of contributions31.1%

Committee & JFC transfer share8.8%

Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.

In-state contributor share16.3%

Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.

Top-20 donor concentration3%

Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving

6.6%

93.4%

Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees

68.9%

31.1%

IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 0% (2004) to 5% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share

2004 0%2006 0.7%2008 0.4%2010 6.9%2012 3.5%2014 2.2%2016 3.3%2018 12.6%2020 10.9%2022 6.6%2024 8%2026 5%

Direct-contribution share

2004 35.8%2006 52.9%2008 99%2010 89.3%2012 80.9%2014 99.9%2016 95.9%2018 98.9%2020 96.3%2022 91.1%2024 91.9%2026 95.7%

PAC share of contributions

2004 37%2006 58.6%2008 56.3%2010 48.8%2012 57.7%2014 50.8%2016 43.4%2018 50.9%2020 50.1%2022 31.1%2024 43.7%2026 27.3%

Cash on hand

2004 $237K2006 $117K2008 $362K2010 $321K2012 $380K2014 $904K2016 $91K2018 $481K2020 $1.0M2022 $658K2024 $617K2026 $1.5M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

Senate Committee on Appropriations

Majority

Senate Committee on Appropriations — Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies

Majority

Senate Committee on Appropriations — Department of Defense

Majority

Senate Committee on Appropriations — Energy and Water Development

Majority

Senate Committee on Appropriations — Department of Homeland Security

Majority

Senate Committee on Appropriations — Department of Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies

Chairman

Senate Committee on Appropriations — Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies

Majority

Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Majority

Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — National Parks

Majority

Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — Public Lands, Forests, and Mining

Majority

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

Majority

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Education and the American Family

Majority

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Primary Health and Retirement Security

Majority

Senate Committee on Indian Affairs

Chairman

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified

$1.4M · 25.5% of itemized

Retired / not employed

$592K · 10.9% of itemized

Finance / insurance

$520K · 9.6% of itemized

Real estate

$113K · 2.1% of itemized

Self-employed

$104K · 1.9% of itemized

Energy

$87K · 1.6% of itemized

Legal

$61K · 1.1% of itemized

Healthcare

$38K · 0.7% of itemized

All other (suppressed)

$26K · 0.5% of itemized

Technology

$20K · 0.4% of itemized

Education

$17K · 0.3% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $7.4M in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $6.5M supporting, $984K opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

ALASKANS FOR L.I.S.A. (LEADERSHIP IN A STRONG ALASKA) FEC ↗

$4.3M supporting

CLEARPATH ACTION FUND, INC. FEC ↗

$1.0M supporting

ALASKA FIRST FEC ↗

$804K opposing

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC FEC ↗

$410K supporting

ALASKANS FOR BRISTOL BAY ACTION FEC ↗

$364K supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.

NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.