Ro Khanna

Democrat U.S. House · CA-17 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in CA

95.9%

Direct-contributionshare

Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $10,570,516 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 98th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

6.4% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 0% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 95.9% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

PACs supplied 0% of contributions here — a smaller PAC share than most campaigns in the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score

Small-donor (grassroots) share6.4%

From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.

Small-dollar by transaction size7.6%

Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.

PAC share of contributions0%

Committee & JFC transfer share0%

Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.

In-state contributor share63.5%

Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.

Top-20 donor concentration2.8%

Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving

6.4%

93.6%

Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees

100%

IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 11.1% (2004) to 13% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share

2004 11.1%2012 1.6%2014 1.4%2016 1.5%2018 6%2020 11.7%2022 4.2%2024 6.4%2026 13%

Direct-contribution share

2004 100%2012 99.8%2014 99.8%2016 99.8%2018 99.5%2020 99.7%2022 99.4%2024 95.9%2026 92.6%

PAC share of contributions

2004 0%2012 0%2014 0%2016 0%2018 0.1%2020 0%2022 0%2024 0%2026 0%

Cash on hand

2004 $1392006 $02012 $1.0M2014 $2K2016 $55K2018 $879K2020 $2.3M2022 $5.3M2024 $10.7M2026 $16.9M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Armed Services

Minority

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Minority

House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party

Ranking Member

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform — Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs

Minority

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform — Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation

Minority

House Committee on Armed Services — Seapower and Projection Forces

Minority

House Committee on Armed Services — Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation

Ranking Member

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $110K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $110K supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

PROTECT PROGRESS FEC ↗

$109K supporting

SOUTH BAY AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL FEC ↗

$1K supporting

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC FEC ↗

$185 supporting

SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION FEC ↗

$10 supporting

WE VOTE - NOSOTROS VOTAMOS - PPAMM COMMITTEE FEC ↗

$2 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.

NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.