All profiles/U.S. House/TN

Diana Harshbarger

Republican U.S. House · TN-1 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in TN
97.1%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $1,930,833 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 45th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

36.5% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 52.6% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 97.1% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Small-dollar donors under $200 supplied 36.5% of this campaign's individual money — among the more small-dollar-funded campaigns in the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share36.5%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size46.8%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions52.6%
Committee & JFC transfer share0.8%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share36.4%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration22.6%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
36.5%
63.5%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
47.4%
52.6%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 12.3% (2020) to 19.5% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
2020 12.3%2022 49.7%2024 36.5%2026 19.5%
Direct-contribution share
2020 88.7%2022 89.4%2024 97.1%2026 91.1%
PAC share of contributions
2020 38.2%2022 26.5%2024 52.6%2026 58.9%
Cash on hand
2020 $258K2022 $935K2024 $1.5M2026 $2.0M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Energy and Commerce
Majority
House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Oversight and Investigations
Majority
House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Energy
Majority
House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Health
Vice Chair

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified
$267K · 47.3% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$167K · 29.6% of itemized
Healthcare
$71K · 12.6% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$15K · 2.6% of itemized
Real estate
$13K · 2.3% of itemized
Government
$10K · 1.7% of itemized
Self-employed
$9K · 1.6% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$7K · 1.3% of itemized
Legal
$6K · 1.1% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $39 in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $39 supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

HOUSE FREEDOM FUND FEC ↗
$39 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.