All profiles/U.S. House/AZ

Adelita S. Grijalva

Democrat U.S. House · AZ-7 · cycle 2026 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in AZ
99.6%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $2,285,639 in the 2026 cycle. FEC ↗

55.2% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 19.1% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.6% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

These figures cover an in-progress election cycle and aren't yet comparable across the U.S. House — funding is spread across individual and committee sources.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share55.2%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size61.6%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions19.1%
Committee & JFC transfer share0%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share61.1%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration15.7%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
55.2%
44.8%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
80.9%
19.1%
IndividualsPACs

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Natural Resources
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce
Minority
House Committee on Natural Resources — Energy and Mineral Resources
Minority
House Committee on Natural Resources — Indian and Insular Affairs
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce — Higher Education and Workforce Development
Minority
House Committee on Education and Workforce — Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education
Minority

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified
$422K · 51.1% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$74K · 9% of itemized
Legal
$57K · 6.8% of itemized
Self-employed
$44K · 5.3% of itemized
Government
$29K · 3.5% of itemized
Education
$26K · 3.2% of itemized
Real estate
$14K · 1.7% of itemized
Healthcare
$14K · 1.7% of itemized
Media / entertainment
$7K · 0.8% of itemized
Technology
$6K · 0.7% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$6K · 0.7% of itemized
Labor / union
$5K · 0.6% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $419K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $385K supporting, $33K opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC FEC ↗
$134K supporting
PROGRESSIVE PROMISE FEC ↗
$95K supporting
CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC FEC ↗
$80K supporting
LCV VICTORY FUND FEC ↗
$60K supporting
TUCSON FAMILIES FED UP PAC FEC ↗
$33K opposing

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.