Jimmy Gomez

Democrat U.S. House · CA-34 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in CA

99.5%

Direct-contributionshare

Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $2,245,653 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 54th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

1.8% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 42.3% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.5% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score

Small-donor (grassroots) share1.8%

From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.

Small-dollar by transaction size2.1%

Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.

PAC share of contributions42.3%

Committee & JFC transfer share0%

Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.

In-state contributor share52.6%

Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.

Top-20 donor concentration11.7%

Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving

1.8%

98.2%

Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees

57.7%

42.3%

IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share down from 7.6% (2018) to 1.9% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share

2018 7.6%2020 4.9%2022 7.7%2024 1.8%2026 1.9%

Direct-contribution share

2018 99.4%2020 97.6%2022 99.3%2024 99.5%2026 99.7%

PAC share of contributions

2018 50.1%2020 72.2%2022 61.8%2024 42.3%2026 44.5%

Cash on hand

2018 $357K2020 $490K2022 $556K2024 $89K2026 $782K

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Ways and Means

Minority

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

Minority

House Committee on Ways and Means — Tax

Minority

House Committee on Ways and Means — Work and Welfare

Minority

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — Central Intelligence Agency

Ranking Member

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — National Intelligence Enterprise

Minority

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $2.4M in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $2.4M supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') FEC ↗

$1.7M supporting

PROTECT PROGRESS FEC ↗

$511K supporting

BOLD AMERICA FEC ↗

$112K supporting

LATINO VICTORY FUND FEC ↗

$21K supporting

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND FEC ↗

$179 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.

NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.