Tom Emmer

Republican U.S. House · MN-6 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in MN

56.5%

Direct-contributionshare

Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $8,158,685 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 94th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

23.9% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 54.7% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 56.5% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

43.5% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) arrived as transfers from other committees and other receipts rather than direct contributions — among the more transfer-funded campaigns in the U.S. House. These transfers are themselves disclosed in the sending committees' filings.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score

Small-donor (grassroots) share23.9%

From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.

Small-dollar by transaction size38.7%

Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.

PAC share of contributions54.7%

Committee & JFC transfer share43.4%

Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.

In-state contributor share13.3%

Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.

Top-20 donor concentration13.4%

Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving

23.9%

76.1%

Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees

45.3%

54.7%

IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share down from 35.9% (2014) to 25.9% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share

2014 35.9%2016 21.6%2018 18.2%2020 30.8%2022 37%2024 23.9%2026 25.9%

Direct-contribution share

2014 99.9%2016 91.8%2018 91%2020 87.8%2022 88.3%2024 56.5%2026 50.2%

PAC share of contributions

2014 13.7%2016 45.7%2018 59.3%2020 59.8%2022 47.5%2024 54.7%2026 45.7%

Cash on hand

2014 $18K2016 $138K2018 $182K2020 $449K2022 $646K2024 $1.7M2026 $4.5M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Financial Services

Majority

House Committee on Financial Services — Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial Intelligence

Vice Chairman

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified

$1.7M · 108.2% of itemized

Retired / not employed

$592K · 37.2% of itemized

Finance / insurance

$427K · 26.8% of itemized

Real estate

$120K · 7.6% of itemized

Legal

$114K · 7.2% of itemized

Technology

$68K · 4.3% of itemized

Healthcare

$57K · 3.6% of itemized

Government

$55K · 3.5% of itemized

All other (suppressed)

$54K · 3.4% of itemized

Self-employed

$34K · 2.2% of itemized

Affiliated committees

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Separate FEC-registered committees linked to this member — leadership-PAC or joint-fundraising vehicles. Each reports its own money in its own filing; those dollars are not part of the receipts above and are never added to them. The link is the FEC candidate–committee association and does not imply the member controls or personally receives these funds.

EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE DBA REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL VICTORY COMMITTEE FEC ↗

raised $7.3M · 2024

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $118K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $118K supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

FAIRSHAKE FEC ↗

$118K supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.

NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.