RepublicanU.S. Senate · LA· cycle 2020 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in LA
89.8%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card
What the money says
Plain language · cited
Raised $7,447,726 in the 2020 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 34th percentile among other U.S. Senate members this cycle.
11.7% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 31.9% of contributions. FEC ↗
Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 89.8% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗
Auto-generated from the data above
PACs supplied 31.9% of contributions here — among the more PAC-funded campaigns in the U.S. Senate.
Funding profile
Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share11.7%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size12.6%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions31.9%
Committee & JFC transfer share8.8%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share43.5%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration9.3%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.
How the money splits
Exact, from FEC aggregates
Individual contributions
Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
11.7%
88.3%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+
All contributions
Individuals vs. political action committees
68.1%
31.9%
IndividualsPACs
Funding mix & position over time
Across every election cycle on record
Small-dollar share down from 2.9% (2008) to 2% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line. Includes cycles run for a different chamber.
Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Majority
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — Energy
Majority
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — National Parks
Majority
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — Water and Power
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance — Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Growth
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance — Health Care
Majority
Senate Committee on Finance — Taxation and IRS Oversight
Majority
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Chairman
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Education and the American Family
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Employment and Workplace Safety
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Primary Health and Retirement Security
Ex Officio
Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Majority
Sector / industry breakdown
Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation
Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.
unclassified
$1.5M · 36.7% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$724K · 18.1% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$496K · 12.4% of itemized
Healthcare
$362K · 9.1% of itemized
Real estate
$126K · 3.2% of itemized
Self-employed
$95K · 2.4% of itemized
Legal
$92K · 2.3% of itemized
Agriculture
$58K · 1.4% of itemized
Energy
$36K · 0.9% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$29K · 0.7% of itemized
Technology
$27K · 0.7% of itemized
Affiliated committees
Separate FEC filings · not counted above
Separate FEC-registered committees linked to this member — leadership-PAC or joint-fundraising vehicles. Each reports its own money in its own filing; those dollars are not part of the receipts above and are never added to them. The link is the FEC candidate–committee association and does not imply the member controls or personally receives these funds.
Outside groups reported $813K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $808K supporting, $4K opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗
Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.
BC