James E. Clyburn

Democrat U.S. House · SC-6 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in SC

99.2%

Direct-contributionshare

Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $2,222,668 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 53rd percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

24.2% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 66.6% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.2% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

PACs supplied 66.6% of contributions here — among the more PAC-funded campaigns in the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score

Small-donor (grassroots) share24.2%

From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.

Small-dollar by transaction size31.3%

Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.

PAC share of contributions66.6%

Committee & JFC transfer share0%

Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.

In-state contributor share24.8%

Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.

Top-20 donor concentration16.3%

Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving

24.2%

75.8%

Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees

33.4%

66.6%

IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 0% (1992) to 36% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share

1992 0%1994 0%1996 0%1998 0%2000 0%2002 13.3%2004 12.5%2006 9%2008 2%2010 4.8%2012 4.8%2014 3.9%2016 18%2018 15.8%2020 13.3%2022 11.8%2024 24.2%2026 36%

Direct-contribution share

1992 27.6%1994 46.7%1996 70.9%1998 56.3%2000 54.2%2002 94%2004 99.9%2006 100%2008 99.9%2010 99.2%2012 99.2%2014 99.6%2016 99.8%2018 99.7%2020 99.4%2022 99.9%2024 99.2%2026 96.2%

PAC share of contributions

1992 38.5%1994 48.8%1996 71.1%1998 66%2000 63.8%2002 56%2004 68.3%2006 72.7%2008 70.4%2010 65.1%2012 79%2014 82%2016 82%2018 86.4%2020 64.9%2022 57.3%2024 66.6%2026 61.2%

Cash on hand

1992 $7951994 $6671996 $55K1998 $90K2000 $207K2002 $239K2004 $206K2006 $352K2008 $1.0M2010 $772K2012 $946K2014 $907K2016 $918K2018 $906K2020 $2.0M2022 $2.3M2024 $1.8M2026 $1.6M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Appropriations

Minority

House Committee on Appropriations — Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies

Ranking Member

House Committee on Appropriations — Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies

Minority

House Committee on Appropriations — Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies

Minority

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $10 in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $10 supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION FEC ↗

$10 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.

NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.