All profiles/U.S. Senate/DE

Lisa Blunt Rochester

Democrat U.S. Senate · DE · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in DE
84.6%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $9,934,497 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 41st percentile among other U.S. Senate members this cycle.

35.8% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 28.1% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 84.6% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. Senate.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share35.8%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size40.5%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions28.1%
Committee & JFC transfer share15.4%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share18.6%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration3.7%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
35.8%
64.2%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
71.9%
28.1%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 25.7% (2016) to 36.4% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line. Includes cycles run for a different chamber.

Small-dollar share
2016 25.7%2018 21.2%2020 16.3%2022 11.5%2024 35.8%2026 36.4%
Direct-contribution share
2016 100%2018 100%2020 99.2%2022 97.6%2024 84.6%2026 79.9%
PAC share of contributions
2016 33%2018 69.4%2020 56.3%2022 47.8%2024 28.1%2026 35.7%
Cash on hand
2016 $125K2018 $245K2020 $964K2022 $582K2024 $144K2026 $121K

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Minority
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Economic Policy
Minority
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Housing, Transportation, and Community Development
Minority
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs — Securities, Insurance, and Investment
Minority
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Minority
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation — Telecommunications and Media
Minority
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation — Consumer Protection, Technology, and Data Privacy
Minority
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation — Coast Guard, Maritime, and Fisheries
Ranking Member
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation — Science, Manufacturing, and Competitiveness
Minority
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Minority
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works — Chemical Safety, Waste Management, Environmental Justice, and Regulatory Oversight
Minority
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works — Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Innovation and Safety
Minority
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works — Transportation and Infrastructure
Minority
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Minority
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Education and the American Family
Ranking Member
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions — Primary Health and Retirement Security
Minority

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $17K in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $17K supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION) FEC ↗
$14K supporting
FIRST STATE STRONG FEC FEC ↗
$3K supporting
GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTION FEC ↗
$179 supporting
GLOBAL DIASPORA PAC INCORPORATED; THE FEC ↗
$91 supporting
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION FEC ↗
$10 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.