All profiles/U.S. House/NE

Don Bacon

Republican U.S. House · NE-2 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in NE
85.5%
Direct-contributionshare
Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $6,358,739 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 89th percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

5.2% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 40.4% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 85.5% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

Funding is spread across individual and committee sources, with no single category standing out from the rest of the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score
Small-donor (grassroots) share5.2%
From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.
Small-dollar by transaction size4.8%
Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.
PAC share of contributions40.4%
Committee & JFC transfer share14.5%
Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.
In-state contributor share24.9%
Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.
Top-20 donor concentration6.4%
Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving
5.2%
94.8%
Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees
59.6%
40.4%
IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share down from 14.2% (2016) to 6% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share
2016 14.2%2018 12.5%2020 19.1%2022 13.7%2024 5.2%2026 6%
Direct-contribution share
2016 99.9%2018 83.7%2020 87.8%2022 91.4%2024 85.5%2026 62.1%
PAC share of contributions
2016 34.8%2018 54%2020 43.6%2022 46.6%2024 40.4%2026 56.6%
Cash on hand
2016 $31K2018 $50K2020 $85K2022 $14K2024 $198K2026 $433K

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Committee on Agriculture
Majority
House Committee on Armed Services
Majority
House Committee on Agriculture — Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry
Majority
House Committee on Agriculture — Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology
Majority
House Committee on Armed Services — Strategic Forces
Majority
House Committee on Armed Services — Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation
Chairman

Sector / industry breakdown

Itemized individual donors · by employer/occupation

Employer/occupation reported on itemized ($200+) individual contributions, grouped into broad sectors. Sectors with fewer than 5 distinct donors are folded into "All other (suppressed)" so no small group can be traced to one donor. Based on this committee's largest itemized contributions (a bounded sample, not the complete donor list) — sector totals are approximate and won't sum to the full itemized total.

unclassified
$1.4M · 44.2% of itemized
Retired / not employed
$718K · 23.4% of itemized
Finance / insurance
$396K · 12.9% of itemized
Self-employed
$96K · 3.1% of itemized
Real estate
$94K · 3.1% of itemized
Legal
$88K · 2.9% of itemized
Energy
$46K · 1.5% of itemized
Technology
$44K · 1.4% of itemized
Healthcare
$39K · 1.3% of itemized
All other (suppressed)
$37K · 1.2% of itemized
Agriculture
$28K · 0.9% of itemized

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $11.1M in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $3.8M supporting, $7.2M opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

$2.8M opposing
DCCC FEC ↗
$2.5M opposing
BIG RED LEADERSHIP PAC FEC ↗
$1.3M supporting
GIFFORDS PAC FEC ↗
$930K opposing
WITH HONOR FUND II, INC. FEC ↗
$850K supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.
NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.