Ami Bera

Democrat U.S. House · CA-6 · cycle 2024 · data as of 2026-11-02 · 2026 races in CA

99.3%

Direct-contributionshare

Aggregate-only · no individual donor names on the card

What the money says

Plain language · cited

Raised $1,250,011 in the 2024 cycle. FEC ↗ Placed at approximately the 23rd percentile among other U.S. House members this cycle.

13.7% of individual money came from small-dollar donors under $200. PACs supplied 63.1% of contributions. FEC ↗

Direct contributions — individuals, PACs, and party — make up 99.3% of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans); the rest is transfers from other committees and other receipts, also disclosed. FEC ↗

Auto-generated from the data above

PACs supplied 63.1% of contributions here — among the more PAC-funded campaigns in the U.S. House.

Funding profile

Unweighted · never a blended score

Small-donor (grassroots) share13.7%

From the unitemized (sub-$200) total, which reconciles exactly against FEC's individual-contribution figure. Small gifts that ActBlue/WinRed itemize aren't counted here — see the size-based measure below.

Small-dollar by transaction size21%

Share of itemized + unitemized contributions received in individual transactions under $200 (FEC schedule_a/by_size), counting each gift by its own amount — so it captures small repeat donors the unitemized field hides. Its denominator is raw itemized receipts, so it reads conservatively.

PAC share of contributions63.1%

Committee & JFC transfer share0%

Share of receipts (excluding self-funding and loans) that arrived as transfers from joint-fundraising and other authorized committees rather than direct contributions — reported in the sending committees’ filings, never undisclosed “dark” money. This bar is the transfer component only, not the whole non-direct remainder — a determined 0% means no transfer receipts (other complement receipts such as offsets may still exist); “—” means no external receipts to decompose.

In-state contributor share73%

Share of itemized individual dollars from in-state donors — unitemized (<$200) contributions have no state breakdown.

Top-20 donor concentration30.7%

Share from the 20 largest individual donors this 2-year period, by exact name — a neutral concentration measure, approximate (recurring small-dollar donors may be undercounted), not a score.

How the money splits

Exact, from FEC aggregates

Individual contributions

Small-dollar (<$200) vs. larger itemized giving

13.7%

86.3%

Small-dollar under $200Itemized $200+

All contributions

Individuals vs. political action committees

36.9%

63.1%

IndividualsPACs

Funding mix & position over time

Across every election cycle on record

Small-dollar share up from 1.4% (2010) to 8.9% (2026) A cycle with too little reported money to trust any ratio is left out entirely; a cycle where one specific figure can't be computed (e.g. an all-itemizing committee has no small-dollar figure to read) is left out of just that line.

Small-dollar share

2010 1.4%2012 16.7%2014 14.3%2016 15.7%2018 17%2020 15%2022 15.3%2024 13.7%2026 8.9%

Direct-contribution share

2010 97.7%2012 98.8%2014 95.2%2016 98.5%2018 100%2020 99.7%2022 99.9%2024 99.3%2026 97.6%

PAC share of contributions

2010 17.6%2012 20.5%2014 34.6%2016 34.4%2018 40.4%2020 47.4%2022 53.5%2024 63.1%2026 53.2%

Cash on hand

2010 $7K2012 $108K2014 $153K2016 $133K2018 $1.3M2020 $2.0M2022 $1.7M2024 $1.9M2026 $1.8M

Committee assignments

congress-legislators (CC0)

Current committee and subcommittee seats, from the public congressional record. Listed independently of the funding figures on this page — a committee seat is not evidence of why any contribution was made.

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

Minority

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

Minority

House Committee on Foreign Affairs — East Asia and Pacific

Ranking Member

House Committee on Foreign Affairs — South and Central Asia

Minority

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — National Intelligence Enterprise

Minority

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — National Security Agency and Cyber

Minority

Outside spending

Separate FEC filings · not counted above

Outside groups reported $242 in independent expenditures naming this candidate this cycle: $242 supporting, $0 opposing (FEC Schedule E). These are filed by the groups themselves, not this candidate's committee, and are not part of the receipts above. FEC ↗

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC FEC ↗

$185 supporting

GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTION FEC ↗

$55 supporting

WE VOTE - NOSOTROS VOTAMOS - PPAMM COMMITTEE FEC ↗

$2 supporting

Individual-donor detail

Held for the deep-table phase. v1 shows aggregate figures only — by design, not by omission.

NameCity / StateEmployerOccupationAmountDateStreet addressPhone

Statutory notice. When individual detail ships, street address and phone are never shown, and the data may not be used to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. §30111(a)(4)). Named individuals appear only here in the deep table — never on a shareable card — each with a match-confidence indicator.